2006 » June » Epigenetics News


Advertise Here

06.11.06

Science Blogs Adds Range of New Voices

Posted in commentary, news links, site news at 1:14 pm by admin

Science Blogs, the compilation of science and health blogs run by Seed Magazine, has added 25 new blogs to their collection, which now features a total of 44 science voices. Updating the blogroll here at Epigenetics News, Dr. Sandra Porter’s Discovering Biology in a Digital World, who has provided some excellent commentary here in the past to spur conversation on science education, made the jump to Science Blogs. Additionally, the former Science and Politics is now known as A Blog Around the Clock, and Evolving Thoughts has made the jump as well.

Highlights among the new blogs at Science Blogs include:

  • The Loom: Written by Carl Zimmer, a freelance science writer who has written five books on science topics and appears regularly in The New York Times and numerous magazines;
  • Effect Measure: “A forum for argument and discussion about progressive public health ideas,” which has been dominated by coverage of the bird flu;
  • The Island of Doubt: “Subjects tackled will range from the intrusion of religion in the public sphere to the presentation of research by the media and the social implications of recent discoveries”.

06.09.06

Epigenomics and Stanford Collaborate on Colorectal Cancer Detection

Posted in cancer, news links at 12:01 am by admin

Epigenomics and the Molecular Imaging Program at Standord (MIPS) have announced an agreement to collaborate in the area of colorectal cancer detection. The research will aim to complement the benefits of both colorectal cancer detection using methylation markers and detection using positron emission tomography (PET).

    Positron emission tomography (PET) is a medical imaging technique which produces a three dimensional image of metabolic activities in the body. In oncology, more than 90% of all PET scans are performed as FDG-PET scans, using (18F) fluorodeoxyglucose (FDG) as a tracer which is taken up by most cells, but retained by tissues with high metabolic activity such as cancer tissue.

    “FDG PET scans have a sensitivity of about 85% and a specificity of 71% in the initial diagnosis and staging of colorectal cancer patients, while our DNA methylation marker has a sensitivity between 50 and 65% and a specificity of 95% in the same indication,” said Dr. Cathy Lofton-Day of Epigenomics. “We therefore would like to find out whether the combination of both methods can increase sensitivity and specificity of colorectal cancer detection. The study may also help us to identify new potential scenarios for clinical uses of our technology.”

A study involving 120 patients will be conducted to determine if combining the two techniques can improve the sensitivity and specificity of colorectal cancer detection. Link

06.08.06

Tangled Bank #54 Now Available

Posted in news links at 11:37 am by admin

The latest edition of The Tangled Bank is now available at Get Busy Livin’, or Get Busy Bloggin’. Highlights include a genetics interview with Dr. David Moskowitz of Genomed on the study of disease genes, the use of RNA interference (RNAi) in gene therapy, and the origins of HIV. Link

06.07.06

New Epigenetics Weekly Newsletter

Posted in site news at 7:00 am by admin

I have decided to put out a weekly newsletter for those interested in keeping up on the latest news and developments in epigenetics. The sign-up form is located in the right sidebar: just enter your e-mail address, then click on the link in the confirmation e-mail that is sent to you.

The newsletter will be mailed out every Sunday at 8 am PT. Thanks to Genetics and Health for leading me to Zookoda, which is handling all of the logistics of the newsletter for free.

06.06.06

Soy Products: Good or Bad?

Posted in environmental alterations, news links at 12:01 am by admin

Following the research article on soy in their April issue, Environmental Health Perspectives has decided to focus their latest issue on “The Science of Soy: What Do We Really Know?” It’s a succinct summary of what little is known about the science of soy products, and how little is known about their benefits or risks.

    The wide variety of soy-based foods, beverages, and nutraceuticals now readily available tout this versatile food’s purported benefits of preventing cardiovascular disease, cancer, and osteoporosis, as well as treating menopausal symptoms. Many of soy’s effects are attributed to its isoflavone components, but the strength of the relationships and whether the effects are beneficial are strongly debated ; one of the most heated debates is over the safety of soy-based infant formula. Most researchers agree that we are only just beginning to understand the nature of soy, and that far more human data are needed in order to make solid recommendations regarding its health benefits. Link

06.02.06

Nutrition During Pregnancy and Its Transgenerational, Epigenetic Effects

Posted in environmental alterations, news links, research articles at 5:42 pm by admin

Today Nature has published a news article highlighting the work of Dr. Rob Waterland of the Baylor College of Medicine in Houston, Texas. Speaking at the Human Genome Organisation meeting in Helsinki, Finland, Dr. Waterland presented research showing that pregnant female mice that were fed a diet containing folic acid and vitamin B12 had pups that were obese. Folic acid and vitamin B12 were already known to affect the methylation pattern of the agouti gene, which can change the mouse coat color.

The researchers then decided to breed the obese, female offfspring of the mice that were fed the diet containing methyl-donating compounds such as folic acid, vitamin B12, betaine, and choline. The researchers hypothesized that the subsequent generations would decrease in weight with additional vitamin supplements in their diet, but they found the opposite: each subsequent generation was more obese than the previous. Dr. Waterland and his team have suggested that the cause may be methylation of an as-yet-unknown gene that may be causing the heritable change in body weight.

The study may have implications for pregnant mothers. Currently, expecting mothers are encouraged to take folic acid supplements because they reduce the chance of having a baby with neural tube defects such as spina bifida. In addition, the United States has mandated fortification of grains and flour with folic acid to increase levels of the compound in women. Further investigation is underway to determine if folic acid alone can cause these lasting effects, and whether they can be compared to folic acid consumption in humans. Link

06.01.06

Early Estrogen Exposure Increases Risk of Prostate Cancer

Posted in cancer, environmental alterations, news links, research articles at 12:01 am by admin

New research published in the June 1 edition of Cancer Research shows that low doses of bisphenol A (BPA) delivered to female rats during pregnancy increases the risk of their male offspring developing prostate cancer later in life. The cause was found to be associated with the elevated level of eastradiol in the aging male rat, which is highly correlated with older human males as a result of increasing body fat and declining testosterone levels.

BPA is used in the manufacture of plastics and epoxy resins, and have been found to be present in human blood serum, some pregnant women, and the human fetus.

The researchers found evidence that the increased risk of precancerous lesions of the prostate was correlated with a permanent change in methylation of certain genes within the neonate’s prostate cells. Specifically, expression of the gene phosphodiesterase 4 (PDE4D4) was found to be highly expressed in male rats exposed to BPA in utero, while expression of the gene in normal male prostate cells was turned off. Prostate cancer cell lines also showed high expression of PDE4D4. This finding could be used to develop a way for identifying men with a higher risk of developing prostate cancer. Link

Update: Co-author Jessica Belmonte de Frausto contacted us with a slight correction: “This study was conducted on neonate rats, not on pregnant rats and their offspring. Although it is important to note that the neonate period in rats does in fact correspond to to the second and third trimester in humans.”

Next entries »