<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Was 2006 a Good Year for Epigenetics?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.epigeneticsnews.com/was-2006-a-good-year-for-epigenetics/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.epigeneticsnews.com/was-2006-a-good-year-for-epigenetics/</link>
	<description>Discoveries and advances in the field of epigenetics</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 08 Jul 2010 01:34:40 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.1</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: ¡Viva La Evolución! :: Tangled Bank #70 :: January :: 2007</title>
		<link>http://www.epigeneticsnews.com/was-2006-a-good-year-for-epigenetics/comment-page-1/#comment-804</link>
		<dc:creator>¡Viva La Evolución! :: Tangled Bank #70 :: January :: 2007</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 03 Jan 2007 12:04:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.epigeneticsnews.com/2006/12/18/was-2006-a-good-year-for-epigenetics/#comment-804</guid>
		<description>[...] At http://www.epigeneticsnews.com/ we have an overview of how good was 2006 for epigenetics      Comments &#187; [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] At <a href="http://www.epigeneticsnews.com/" rel="nofollow">http://www.epigeneticsnews.com/</a> we have an overview of how good was 2006 for epigenetics      Comments &raquo; [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
